Choir Competition

Choir competitions allow for the giving and receiving of inspiration. As much as conductors work to motivate, encourage and inspire choirs, peer inspiration is even more effective. In short, children inspire children, and most effectively through live performance. Making progress in any endeavour requires having a goal. But a goal to improve requires knowledge of what an improved performance is. Choirs can acquire this knowledge best by listening to and modelling themselves on competent choirs, thereby learning a new sense of musical possibility. Visit a competition and watch the intense engagement of the listening choirs. You could hear a pin drop! Children think along the lines “if they can sing as well as this, then so can we”. Conversely, having the skills and capability to inspire is an important responsibility. Such choirs can contribute to a general rise in the quality of choral music by allowing other choirs the opportunity to hear and to see them. Choirs that are inspired one year become the inspirers the next. I know of a choir that stopped participating in competition because they were regular winners. One could say this was magnanimous in giving other choirs the opportunity to win, but on the other hand, they had a great capacity to inspire. What is more valuable?

Conductors need inspiration too. The greatest factor in any choral improvement is the increased skill and musicality of the conductor. A choir will not advance significantly without conductor improvement. In a sense, adjudicators adjudicate conductors, not choirs. Therefore, watching and learning from other conductors should be a priority for any conductor. Competition creates opportunity to liaise with others. For example, conductors can set up opportunities to observe one another’s choir rehearsals.

The decision to enter a competition provides an immediate goal. Choirs must have goals to work toward. In a broader sense, having a goal is inherently positive and promotes wellbeing and excitement for the future.  Committing to a competition places an added element of pressure which can in turn give the conductor an excuse for being extra-fussy in the pursuit of excellence. Seeking excellence is important to children, as they like to distinguish themselves through their abilities. Like us, they understand that there are certain opportunities, certain experiences and certain jobs that only excellence can partake in. Excellence begets excellence and the rewards of excellence include a transformation of the self, a new sense of possibility and greater personal self-esteem.

In the past, a shared responsibility for our children centred on a tripartite concern involving family, community and school. Today, this three-legged stool is imbalanced. Competitions allow for public recognition and acknowledgement outside of the immediate school domain, providing an opportunity for community engagement. Recognition and appreciation are fundamentally motivational because it is a human need to feel important, special, and valued. Another reason children find public performance thrilling is because they love to impart their unique interpretation of aesthetic beauty to others. The power of music in this sense is due to a) its interpreted emotional consistency and b) the intrapersonal knowledge that comes from an emotional encounter through music. Even if children can’t explain this in words, they appreciate the importance of their musical offering. Public performance provides special opportunities for recognition and sharing.

Great learners seek learning opportunities, and opportunities to learn abound in competitions. Choir competitions and festivals allow participants to listen to one another. Implicit in the nature of competition is the impetus to be evaluative, to compare, and to make judgements. These higher-order thinking skills are essential for personal progress. To turn competition into an explicit learning experience, teachers can assign students a project to evaluate choirs based on set criteria. In a choir competition,

I ask students to comment on the following:

  • Is the singing in tune?
  • How well are the parts balanced?
  • Can I understand the words? Is the text uniformly articulated?
  • Is there sufficient word-painting or emphasis on important words?
  • Is the emotional intention of the piece being conveyed?
  • Are the dynamics appropriate and sufficiently contrasting?
  • How engaged is the choir with this song?
  • How engaged/interactive is the conductor with the choir?
  • What is noticeable about the posture of the choir?
  • Does the choir work as one at the beginning and end of phrases?
  • Do the ends of phrases finish accurately?
  • Is the piano accompaniment balanced with the choir?
  • What do I like about this performance?
  • What would I do differently?

Competitions are a place to hear new repertoire and to appreciate new interpretations. Mind you, one doesn’t need to be a competitor to attend as an audience member.

Feedback received from an adjudicator will hopefully be constructive and taken as such. Feedback is essential for progress and for the continual re-setting of goals. Feedback needs to be consistent and accurate, but presents a potential for conflict as some aspects of performance evaluation may be construed as being subjective. Some people don’t like feedback, and indeed don’t seek it, but like it or not, we all need it.

When I ask children if they would like to enter choral competitions, the overwhelming response is affirmative. If there is reservation, it usually comes from the conductor. For some conductors, the word ‘competition’ has a negative connotation. But competition is in the eye of the beholder; how we contextualise it, and how we present it to our choir. The noble and honourable purpose of competition is to seek excellence together, not to destroy one another as some sporting contests would portray. Psychologist Mihalyi Csiksentmihalyi discusses competition in Flow, The Psychology of Optimal Experience:

Indeed, the roots of the word ‘compete’ are the Latin ‘con petire’, which means ‘to seek together’. What each person seeks is to actualize her potential, and this task is made easier when others force us to do our best. Of course, competition improves experience only as long as attention is focused primarily on the activity itself. If extrinsic goals—such as beating the opponent, wanting to impress an audience, or obtaining a big professional contract—are what one is concerned about, then competition is likely to become a distraction, rather than an incentive to focus on what is happening. (p.73)

Most choirs entering competitions have experienced a disappointing decision that might, on another day, have favoured them. Nobody agrees with every decision, and this replicates the reality of life, providing opportunity to learn how to accept perceived unfairness or defeat. This invites conductors and choristers to build character; for they must then take the step to congratulate the successful choirs.

Well-intentioned adults will sometimes try to protect children from failure. Naturally the definition of ‘failure’ depends on pre-conceived expectations, but children will not learn how to handle failures if they are prevented from experiencing them. Life is full of competitions, failures, and tests of character. Some conductors (and schools) have reputations that they are protective of. In his defence to decline participating, a conductor once said to me “I have everything to lose and nothing to gain by entering this competition”. This fear of failure and protection of reputation is symptomatic of what Stanford University’s Carol Dweck calls a fixed ability mindset. In Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, Dweck says that deep down, this type of person doubts their capacity to improve competency. They have a deterministic view of their intelligence probably from long held beliefs that their musicality is attributed to genetic rather than effortful factors. Dweck’s fascinating studies clearly show that the way we praise children generates this fixed-intelligence mindset. When we praise children for being ‘gifted’ and ‘natural’, they exhibit regressive learning behaviour such as avoiding feedback and avoiding uncomfortable challenges. They give up easily when obstacles arise, take fewer risks and are desperate to preserve an image of being talented. In short, fixed-intelligence mindset children peak early in their career and are less likely to fulfil their potential. Conversely, a growth-intelligence mindset is shaped by praise for work ethic and effort. “I am who I am through my own efforts” said Beethoven. Growth-intelligence mindset individuals accept failure as a necessity for improvement. These people seek challenge, seek feedback, and often venture out of their comfort zone in order to learn. Praise is a strong behavioural modifier. As teachers and responsible adults we should understand how it works.

From ‘Bumblebee: Rounds & Warm-ups for Choirs’ by Michael Griffin

New – 2nd edition with 25% more exercises.

BookCover VR

‘Bumblebee: Rounds & Warm-ups for Choirs’

Bumblebee! is more than just a collection of 123 choir exercises and rounds. The author shares timeless wisdom to help you get your choir – primary or secondary – into shape.

 View Table of Contents.

“This is really good for all kinds of vocal groups, choirs, conductors. Bravo!!”

“The thinking person’s guide to training a choir. Love it!”

“It’s great to have some fresh warm-ups to add to the repertory. The tips for actions and techniques are really useful, and the advice at the back of the book has made me review some of my strategies.”


front cover final

Latest review

“A must read for all music educators” – Robert Adams, New Haven, USA.

“Super book. I am so impressed!” – Donna Michaels, USA

“Fantastic book, simply brilliant! – Ian Cooper, Norfolk, UK

“Don’t miss this opportunity!” – Mary George, USA

“Rarely do I come away feeling so inspired. Incredibly beneficial.” – Music Matters Blog

“Such a practical book. SO glad I purchased this. – Jocelyn Beath, NZ

“Most stimulating!” – Nicholas Carpenter, Prebendal, UK

“A must buy for every music teacher and music student” – William Bruce, Teacher of Strings, UK.

“Deeply impressive, the breadth of research is fascinating!” – Robert Chamberlain, Team of Pianists and Monash University Piano Staff, Victoria Australia.

“Awesome! I want to recommend it to every teacher I know” – Michael Williamson, Australia

“I loved it. Extremely helpful and inspiring!” – Cheryl Livingstone, Australia

“The best resource for music educators” – Andrew Heuzenroeder, Australia

“I have read your book and it has made an amazing difference in my teaching and in my studio.” Beth Cruickshank, Past President – Ontario Registered Music Teachers Association.

Amazon UK
Kindle US
Kindle UK
Australia: Contact for direct mail.

Also by Michael Griffin


Music and Keyboard in the Classroom: Fundamentals of Notation is a unit of work for general music middle school classes. Designed around the mastering of practical skills, it integrates theory, aural and history, and allows students to progress at their own rate. View Table of Contents.  “This has been a great buy; the books are just superb! Interesting topics with a wide range of pieces. Great content with clear progression of learning. Fascinating teaching philosophy! BRAVO!” -The Grieg Academy, London. Available at

BookCoverPreview Bk 2

Music and Keyboard in the Classroom: Let’s Get Creative! is the fun and creative extension to ‘Fundamentals of Notation’.

View Table of Contents. “We have been using your keyboard course and the results have been amazing!”  – St George College, Australia

Available at

harmony bk cover

Modern Harmony Method: Fundamentals of Jazz and Popular Harmony (Third Edition, 2013) is a clear and well organised text suitable for students of arranging and composition, and for classically trained musicians wishing to grasp the beautiful logic of jazz harmony. Essential understandings include chord selection, voicing, symbols, circle of 4th progressions, extensions, suspensions and alterations. Included in the 107 pages are explanations, examples, exercises and solutions. The course can be started with students in year 9 and worked through to year 12 musicianship, composing and arranging.  Available at

Public speaker, music education trainer, conductor and pianist. Author of 'Learning Strategies for Musical Success', 'Bumblebee: Rounds & Warm-ups for Choirs', and 'Modern Harmony Method'.

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Choir, Music Education
6 comments on “Choir Competition
  1. Dr. Prof. Edward Charles. says:

    As one who conducts many times weekly (for over six decades) – and writes motivational articles daily, I compliment M.D.Griffin on his ‘Choir Competition’ disquisition.

    It’s relevance and practicality is most impressive.

    The best compliment I can offer is that I said to myself “I could have written that!”

    I totally concur with the simply expressed thoughts and found it competently instructive.

    By comparison to my productions which become too technical and weighty (?), the conveyed thoughts are admirably concise, lucid and uncomplicated.

    I have printed it for further consideration, examination, and with approval, possible distribution with my literature.


  2. Jake Huff says:

    Beautifully written and well thought out article, Michael. A very enjoyable and informative read. Thank you for taking the time to articulate what others may know but not know that they know. I have seen the “fixed intelligence mindset” vs. the “growth intelligence mindset” in my own life and development as a musician and conductor. When I have a big challenge ahead of me, I do my best work. When it’s the same-o same-o, I tend to plateau. I remember the competitions and festivals in which I participated as a high school student in Frankfurt, Germany. Those events were among the highlights and fondest memories of my time there.

  3. Very good, keep up the good work. I had the pleasure of studying under Weston Noble out at Luther College when he was still working. I understand he has worked with many other people such as yourself and all have learned from him.
    I wish I had finished at Luther in the little town of Decorah Iowa, but I am more of a professional musician so I had attended Berklee College of Music as well after I had left Luther. A little more advanced in the pop and jazz than the choral or orchestrations at Luther, it was more my speed.
    There was nothing in the world that could beat singing the Messiah at Luther under Dr Noble with eight hundred voices from all over. The funniest part was there were only thirty two tenors out of 800.

    Erik Hans Vagen NJ

  4. This is a wonderful piece of writing on music education. I am thrilled and edified. I have been looking for educative materials for choir competition. I find this essay very useful.

    • mdgriffin63 says:

      Thanks reverend, I appreciate your comment. You can read more where this came from in ‘Bumblebee! Rounds & Warm-ups for Choirs’ and ‘Learning Strategies for Musical Success’. Both available from Amazon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: